↓ Skip to main content
DataScience.LA
Re: Sorry for the mix up regarding Data Science candidates

Re: Sorry for the mix up regarding Data Science candidates

·4 mins
Random R data science python hiring
Author
Andrew Parker

This was originally posted on the author’s LinkedIn

You will find lots of advice on how to get a job as a data scientist. I want to add some signal to the noise.

I happen to be hiring for a Data Scientist or two as of this writing, and was thinking of doing a blog post on offering advice for those looking. But then I thought of something better and more insightful: It is a cut-and-paste of an email that I sent to our Director of Talent Acquisition last week when he asked me, “Can you share with me what you’re looking for in regards to your Data Scientist candidates?”

Here it is:

Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:39:10 -0800
Delivered-To: XXXX@ziprecruiter.com
Subject: Re: Sorry for the mix up regarding Data Science candidates
From: Andrew Parker <XXXX@ziprecruiter.com>
To: Ron Miguel <XXXX@ziprecruiter.com>
Cc: Nicole Prause <XXXX@ziprecruiter.com>

–001a113a9c2e9685c2050d95cea1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Ron,

Thanks for all your help on this. Nikky, please add your thoughts to this
thread.

In general, for this Data Science position, the question is: Can this
person teach us something, and do they bring to the table some core
competency that is missing from the team? Are they senior enough to teach
others when we hire more junior people in the near future?

*If they are new PhDs:*
The thinking is that they’re probably smart, and really it’s a question of
seeing if their interests and expectations are aligned with the actual
projects we have to work on, and to gauge their willingness to learn the
problem domain (SaaS business issues: LTV, Churn / Retention, etc.) and
tools. Seeing extensive use of Python and R is most important. I want to
get a sense that they were the “hacker” in their lab.

The nature of the data matters: specifically I like to see them deal with
messy, noisy, incomplete, unstructured, human inputted or driven data.
Examples are NLP and text processing, linguistic modeling, survey and
clinical data, economic and sociology data, web scraped (or API) data from
Twitter, facebook, etc. Less ideal is data that is highly structured, and
precise or all theoretical.

*If they are new Masters or BS graduates:*
Many of these resumes are over-inflated and key-word stuffed, and I really
have to read between the lines to figure out what they’ve actually done. I
find these the most difficult to read.

*If they have industry experience:*
Anything applying analytical and data processing skills to problems
relevant to ZipRecruiter where they were the lead developer is what we’re
looking for. They have to be able to deal with raw and mostly unstructured
data. E.g. “Go look in this Apache access log file for what you need.” I am
yet unable to accommodate candidates that are accustomed to an IT team
doing all the cleaning and curation of data.

*On-site:*
I’d like to have them present something and do a deep-dive on the data,
analysis, code, and insights. I think recent graduates and academics will
have a huge advantage since they are likely working with data and code they
can share publicly. So the on-site visit will be different from the usual
software engineering visit. Maybe for those that don’t have data handy that
they can talk about, Nikky and I will have to identify some data for them
to do a sort of “take home project.” We haven’t gotten to that point yet
though.

*Candidate work-flow:*
We’ll wait for your process guidelines, but in the mean time we’ll score
candidates and make more detailed internal notes.

Thanks!
-Andrew

And that’s it.

Keep in mind that this is for a senior position and describes my team’s particular needs at this point in time. I sent this email well before I contemplated writing a blog post. I hope some of you find this helpful.

If you’re curious, we still have that open Data Scientist position here:
https://www.ziprecruiter.com/jobs/ziprecruiter-bf882208/data-scientist-db7104a3

Related

XGBoost workshop and meetup talk with Tianqi Chen

XGBoost workshop and meetup talk with Tianqi Chen

·3 mins
Machine Learning / Data Science R data science machine learning predictive modeling production python gradient boosting GBM
XGBoost is a fantastic open source implementation of Gradient Boosting Machines, a general purpose supervised learning method that achieves the highest accuracy on a wide range of datasets in practical applications. Deep learning is all the hype now, but apart from specific domains such as images, speech or text (i.e. problems with higher-level abstractions to be learnt and/or perception problems, where deep learning achieved some remarkable results indeed), it is usually outperformed by Gradient Boosting in a majority of general business domains and supervised learning applications. Proof of this and also because XGBoost has an easy-to-use interface from both R and Python, XGBoost has become a favorite tool in Kaggle competitions. Besides feature engineering, cross-validation and ensembling, XGBoost is a key ingredient for achieving the highest accuracy in many data science competitions and more importantly in practical applications.
What has Kaggle learned from 2 million machine learning models?

What has Kaggle learned from 2 million machine learning models?

·2 mins
Meetups Machine Learning / Data Science R education statistics data science machine learning meetups big data python
What has Kaggle learned from 2 million machine learning models? Anthony Goldbloom, founder and CEO of Kaggle UPDATE:Video recording of the talk available here Kaggle is a community of almost 450K data scientists who have built almost 2MM machine learning models to participate in our competitions. Data scientists come to Kaggle to learn, collaborate and develop the state of the art in machine learning. This talk will cover some of the lessons on winning techniques we have learned from the Kaggle community.